Articles in Support of Richard Stallman
In the wake of the events of September 2019 that led to the resignation of Richard Stallman from MIT and the FSF, a large part of the community felt hurt by what they saw as an injustice to Stallman that caused damage not only to him, but to the entire free software movement as well.
After Stallman announced his return to the FSF Board of Directors on March 21, 2021, a tsunami of virulent attacks to him and the FSF reached unprecedented proportions risking to destroy the very roots of the free software movement.
We are reproducing here, either verbatim or remixed, some of the articles in defense of Richard Stallman that people wrote, addressing the events of either September 2019 or March 2021. Other articles are linked to their original websites.
Articles in this Website #local-articles
- Nadine Strossen and Hannah Wolfman-Jones Rebut Accusations Against Stallman and Choose Him as Coauthor. Hannah Wolfman-Jones, website founder, book editor and author, seeks the advice of Nadine Strossen, former ACLU president, about whether to include Richard Stallman as coauthor of a book. The decision is “Yes.”
-
Richard Stallman Is Vilified by Those Who Don't Know Him, Says Sylvia Paull.
Sylvia Paull, a well-known feminist who has known Richard Stallman for many years,
remembers him as her guest,
He was kind, attentive, and has a loving core.
- Renata Avila: Trying to Understand the Lynching of Stallman. The author, a feminist human rights and technology lawyer, strives to comprehend the reasons behind the vicious attacks.
- Letter of Support for Richard Stallman - Doing Better in Community. Karrie Peterson, librarian at MIT, shares her experience with Richard Stallman and calls for communities to use higher standards of discourse.
- Margarita Lacabe: My Relationship with Richard. Stallman's former girlfriend tells us about her experience with him.
- Richard Stallman Is Not Transphobic, Says Leah Rowe. Transwoman Leah Rowe explains why Richard Stallman is not transphobic, and calls the community to defend him.
External Articles #external-articles
These are articles that people wrote about the events of September 2019 to explain what happened and ask for justice.
- Justice for
Dr. Richard Matthew Stallman (
Archived) The point of view of
a married, orthodox, staunch Catholic who supports chastity and Christian morality—within a coherent and reasonably tolerant worldview inspired by the phenomenal Pope Francis. I oppose several of Stallman’s views on sex and related subjects.
Objective, accurate, clearly written, concise and to the point. Highly recommended. #jorge -
Low grade “journalists” and internet mob attack RMS with
lies. In-depth review (Archived) Exposes the lies spread
by journalists and initiates a petition asking them to apologize to
Stallman. The author compares excerpts of the blog post
by Ms. Selam Jie Gano[1] and shows
how journalists based their reports on Gano's personal interpretation of
the emails rather than the sources. Worth reading, keeping in mind that
it contains some inaccuracies:
- The word “allegedly” when mentioning Epstein' crimes is incorrect since Epstein was actually convicted in 2008.
- The author admits he doesn't understand why the newspaper mentions Joi Ito. The reason is that Joi Ito was involved in the MIT candal. #sterling
-
How the cancel culture was leveraged against RMS (
Archived)
The content and the tone of Selam G.’s article is archetypal of the cancel culture and she was joined by people sharing the same faith to demand the resignation of Richard Stallman.
A dispassionate, rational view by Loïc Dachary that invites reflection. #loic - Why I stand up for Stallman (Archived) How neurodiverse individuals are treated badly by the community. Presented from the point of view of the author's personal experience and contact with Richard Stallman. Written in 2011 by Dave Winer, still relevant today. #winer
Related External Articles #related-external-articles
- The Practice of Ritual Defamation (Archived) Written in 2010, this short essay by Laird Wilcox is pertinent today and specially applicable to the defamation of Richard Stallman. The modus operandi described by Wilcox matches seamlessly the procedure adopted by Stallman's attackers. A 5 minutes read worth one or two whole books on the subject. #wilcox
-
On Non-Judicical Punishment of Individuals (Archived) An interesting consideration of shunning as a form of punishment in the
absence of a judicial process. Recommended, keeping in mind these two points:
- We tend to think that the description of Richard Stallman as “extremely obnoxious” is based on interactions between the two in the past in the context of disagreements about the philosophical grounds of the movement. The two are not enemies and are in talking terms. Most importantly, we have evidence that after hard work along the years, Stallman has upgraded his behavior from “obnoxious” to just “annoying.”
- Stallman was never an employee of the FSF but a volunteer. He never received a penny from the FSF. Therefore, ADA would not apply. But even if for some reason it did apply, it's unlikely that Stallman would ever sue the FSF. #perens
- Beating Back Cancel Culture: A Case Study from the Field of Artificial Intelligence (Archived)
The mob leader even wrote lengthy Twitter threads listing off the names of anyone who’d liked or retweeted my critiques of her position, suggesting they were all bigots.
On how cancel culture works, and how to deal with it. #cancel-culture
References and Notes
- https://selamjie.medium.com/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794 ↑